This plan is for the common use of the entire department (faculty members, administration, coordinator, commission). The responsible person/team is clarified in each action step.
Why Are We Doing This? Before the semester starts, we must check the "field" and the "rules". MUDEK requires us to guarantee that education is carried out not only in the classroom but also in safe laboratories and with a correct curriculum.
Critical Concepts:
Relevant MUDEK Articles: Criterion 5 (Curriculum), Criterion 7 (Infrastructure).
Basic Definitions:
📊 Pre-Test - Post-Test Logic (Criterion 4 - Continuous Improvement):
⚠️ OHS Note (Criterion 7.5): Notifying students of OHS rules and obtaining their signatures in laboratory courses is critical evidence for auditors.
Why Are We Doing This? Consistency between the course information package on the website and the practice in the classroom (Bologna Compliance) is the basis of reliability. Also, student participation in the process (Representative election) is required by Criterion 9.
Tip: The first 10 business days are the "preparation + announcement + first implementation" period for faculty members. The coordinator/commission's consolidation-audit tasks may administratively extend to the 3rd-4th week even if data collection is finished early.
Critical Distinction (PEO vs PO):
Why Are We Doing This? We are obliged to get the opinion of External Stakeholders (Employers and Graduates) to understand whether our education meets the current needs of the sector (Criterion 2).
Evidence Value: In the Advisory Board meeting, not just "chatting" should take place; concrete Decision Minutes such as "The sector suggested software X, so we added it to the curriculum" must be created.
Post-Test (Course Process Survey): When evaluated together with the Expectation Survey (Pre-Test) applied in stage 2, it scientifically measures the value added by the program to the student.
Graduation Candidate (Exit) Survey (Criterion 3.3): It is one of the indirect measurement tools used to prove that students who have reached the graduation stage have achieved the program outcomes.
Data reliability: If participation remains low, the representativeness of the data weakens. At least 30% participation should be targeted in student surveys.
What is a Course Binder? It is the black box of that course's quality journey. It must contain exam questions, answer key, grade sheet, and most importantly Student Evidence (Examples of papers receiving the best, average, and lowest grades).
Civil Engineering Special Note: Especially in design course files;
Why Are We Doing This? When auditors come to the school, they examine these files, not the student.
📊 Value-Added Analysis (Pre-Test - Post-Test):
Criterion 1.6 (Graduation Audit): MUDEK wants to see that the graduation decision is made with "reliable methods". Therefore, graduation commission minutes and checklists must be kept.
PDCA: This stage is the "Check" and "Act" parts. It proves that data is transformed into decision/action.
Evidence Room: It is the place where all course binders, meeting minutes, and official letters are exhibited for auditors in a physical or digital environment.
Look Back: Auditors want to see records not only of this year but also of previous years (at least 1 full cycle). Continuity is essential.
Tip: In delegation interviews, saying "I can check this data from our quality system and get back to you" instead of "I don't know" shows that you trust your system.
| Survey | Related Criterion/Criteria | Application Time |
|---|---|---|
| Student Expectation Survey (Pre-Test) | Criterion 4 (Continuous Improvement - Data Basis) | Stage 2 (Beginning of sem.) |
| Course Process Survey | Criterion 5 (Curriculum) | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| Advisor Satisfaction | Criterion 1.4 | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| Student Satisfaction (Dept) | Criterion 1, 7, 8 | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| International Student | Criterion 1.3 (Mobility) | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| Academic Staff | Criterion 6, 8, 9 | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| Alumni Survey | Criterion 2.3 (PEO Monitoring) | Stage 3 (After midterm) |
| Graduation Candidate (Exit) Survey | Criterion 3.3 (PO Achievement) | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| External Stakeholder Survey | Criterion 2.2-c, 3 (PO) | Stage 3 (After midterm) |
| Stage | Main Criterion | Sub-Criteria | Key Personnel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Strategic Planning | 5, 7, 8, 9 | 1.1, 6.1 | Admin + Commission |
| 2. Bologna & Org. + Expectation Survey | 3, 4, 5, 9 | 1.4 | All Faculty + Commission |
| 3. Ext. Stakeholders | 2 | 2.2-c, 2.3 | Admin + Coordinator (Alumni + Ext. Stakeholder) |
| 4. Assessment & Survey | 1, 3, 6 | 2.3, 3.3 | All Faculty + Coordinator (Grad. Candidate) |
| 5. Course Binder Audit | 3, 5 | - | All Faculty + Commission |
| 6. Analysis & PDCA | 2, 3, 4 | 1.6 | Graduation Commission + Quality Commission |
| 7. Site Visit * | All | - | All Department |