This plan is for the common use of the entire department (faculty members, administration, coordinator, commission). The responsible person/team is clarified in each action step.
Why Are We Doing This? Before the semester starts, we must check the "field" and the "rules". MUDEK requires us to guarantee that education is carried out not only in the classroom but also in safe laboratories and with a correct curriculum.
Critical Concepts:
Relevant MUDEK Articles: Criterion 5 (Curriculum), Criterion 7 (Infrastructure).
Basic Definitions:
Why Are We Doing This? "You must do what you promise." Consistency between the course information package on the website and the practice in the classroom (Bologna Compliance) is the basis of reliability. Also, student participation in the process (Representative election) is required by Criterion 9.
Tip: The Course Syllabus is a "contract" made with the student. If the relationship between exams and POs is not established here, we cannot collect data at the end of the semester.
Critical Distinction (PEO vs PO):
Why Are We Doing This? We are obliged to get the opinion of External Stakeholders (Employers and Graduates) to understand whether our education meets the current needs of the sector (Criterion 2).
Evidence Value: In the Advisory Board meeting, not just "chatting" should take place; concrete Decision Minutes such as "The sector suggested software X, so we added it to the curriculum" must be created.
What Are We Measuring?
Critical Survey: "Graduation Candidate (Exit) Survey". According to Criterion 3.3, the student must declare that they have achieved all program outcomes just before receiving their diploma.
Why Are We Doing This? MUDEK is not satisfied with just "passed the course" information. It asks us to answer the question "Did the student gain PO-7 (Communication) skill?" with both exam grade and survey result (Triangulation/Data Diversification).
What is a Course Binder? It is the black box of that course's quality journey. It must contain exam questions, answer key, grade sheet, and most importantly Student Evidence (Examples of papers receiving the best, average, and lowest grades).
Civil Engineering Special Note: Especially in design course files;
Why Are We Doing This? When auditors come to the school, they examine these files, not the student.
PDCA Cycle (Plan-Do-Check-Act): It is the heart of quality assurance.
Graduation Control (Criterion 1.6): Just completing credits is not enough. Our commission must verify the compliance of the internships and courses taken by the graduating student with MUDEK criteria through "reliable methods" (Check-list).
Result: We cannot say "Cycle Closed" without completing this stage. Collecting data is not enough, we must prove that we make data-based improvements.
Evidence Room: It is the place where all course binders, meeting minutes, and official letters are exhibited for auditors in a physical or digital environment.
Look Back: Auditors want to see records not only of this year but also of previous years (at least 1 full cycle). Continuity is essential.
Tip: In delegation interviews, saying "I can check this data from our quality system and get back to you" instead of "I don't know" shows that you trust your system.
| Survey | Related Criterion/Criteria | Application Time |
|---|---|---|
| Student Expectation Survey (Pre-Test) | Criterion 4 (Continuous Improvement - Data Base) | Phase 2 (Beginning of Term) |
| Course Process Survey | Criterion 5 (Curriculum) | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| Advisor Satisfaction | Criterion 1.4 | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| Student Satisfaction (Dept) | Criterion 1, 7, 8 | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| International Student | Criterion 1.3 (Mobility) | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| Academic Staff | Criterion 6, 8, 9 | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| Alumni Survey | Criterion 2.3 (PEO Monitoring) | Stage 3 (After midterm) |
| Graduation Candidate (Exit) Survey | Criterion 3.3 (PO Achievement) | Stage 4 (Before finals) |
| External Stakeholder Survey | Criterion 2.2-c, 3 (PO) | Stage 3 (After midterm) |
| Stage | Main Criterion | Sub-Criteria | Key Personnel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2. Bologna & Organization + Expectation Survey | 3, 4, 5, 9 | 1.4 | All Faculty Members + Commission |
| 1. Strategic Planning | 5, 7, 8, 9 | 1.1, 6.1 | Admin + Commission |
| 2. Bologna & Organization | 3, 5, 9 | 1.4 | All Faculty + Commission |
| 3. Ext. Stakeholders | 2 | 2.2-c, 2.3 | Admin + Coordinator (Alumni + Ext. Stakeholder) |
| 4. Assessment & Survey | 1, 3, 6 | 2.3, 3.3 | All Faculty + Coordinator (Grad. Candidate) |
| 5. Course Binder Audit | 3, 5 | - | All Faculty + Commission |
| 6. Analysis & PDCA | 2, 3, 4 | 1.6 | Graduation Commission + Quality Commission |
| 7. Site Visit * | All | - | All Department |